Search Results for "Majority rule"

2306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Panchayat Samiti Party Leadership Dispute Under Maharashtra Local Authorities Members Disqualification Act. District Collector's Approval of New Party Leader Upheld as Valid Based on Majority Resolution and Definition of Panchayat Samiti Party Under Section 2(l).

The dispute arose from the removal of the appellant as Party Leader (Gatneta) of the INCPS Party, a Panchayat Samiti party formed by members elected o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Disqualification Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Inquiry.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by members of the Gram Panchayat of village Krishna, challenging an order dated 23rd April 2010 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Quashing No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Service of Notice on Adult Member of Family Under No Confidence Motion Rules, 1975, Held Sufficient Despite Meeting Rules Requirement of Service on Male Member.

The petitioners, members of Village Panchayat Futana, challenged an order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which had allowed an appeal by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Petitioner's removal upheld as meeting complied with procedural requirements under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Rules.

The petitioner, Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talegaon Dashasar. On 05.12.2016, a no confidence motion was pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Restoration of Majority Award on Escalation Clause Interpretation. Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 Not Attracted as Arbitral Interpretation of Contract Clause Was Plausible.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside a majority arbitral award under Section 30 of the Arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Collector's Approval of New Group Leader in Panchayat Samiti Party — Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Removal Without Notice Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sau. Sangeeta Shinde, was elected as Gatneta (Group Leader) of the Indian National Congress party in the Shrirampur Panchayat Samiti, ...