Search Results for "Madras General Sales Tax Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Madras General Sales Tax Rules"

141 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 141 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show-Cause Notice Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — DGGI Officer Not Authorized as Proper Officer. The court held that only officers specifically authorized by the Commissioner can issue notices under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the DGGI officer lacked such authorization.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s NCS Pearson Inc., a Minnesota-based corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

High Court

Supreme Court Allows Union's Appeals in Advance Authorization IGST Exemption Case. The Court upholds the pre-import condition as a valid policy measure to prevent double benefit and cash blockage, reversing the Gujarat High Court's decision.

10 Oct 2024

The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a Gujarat High Court judgment that set aside the mandatory 'pre-import condition' for claiming...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Secured Creditor Against Tax Recovery Attachment — Priority of Secured Creditor Over Crown Debts Upheld Under SARFAESI Act. The court held that Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act gives priority to secured creditors over income tax dues, and the attachment order passed after creation of security interest is void.

28 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd., a securitization and asset reconstruction company registered under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, fi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.

19 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Awards in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Court Holds That Construction of Contractual Clause by Arbitrator Falls Within Arbitral Domain and Is Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jun 2019

The case involves five appeals filed by Central Warehousing Corporation (the appellant) against a common judgment dated 18.02.2019 dismissing its arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

High Court Allows Revision in KVAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Assessee Entitled to Compute ITC on Books of Account and Claim Rebate for Research Division Purchases. The court held that the assessee could compute input tax credit based on books of account under Sections 11, 14, 17 of KVAT Act and was entitled to rebate for purchases by its ancillary research division.

26 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference in Sales Tax Case - Transfer of Motor Car by Firm to Partner on Dissolution Not a Sale. The court held that distribution of assets on dissolution does not constitute a 'sale' under Section 2(28) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, as there is no transfer of property for a price.

6 May 2010

The case concerns a reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the assessee, M/s Synthetic Suppliers, a partn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State’s Appeal in Sales Tax Matter Concerning Deduction of Excise Duty. Raw Tobacco and Processed Chewing Tobacco Constitute Different Marketable Products, So Excise Duty Paid on Raw Tobacco Cannot Be Deducted from Turnover of Chewing Tobacco Under Rule 5(1)(i) of Madras General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, 1939.

14 Dec 1965

The respondent, a tobacco factory in Vedaranyam, purchased raw tobacco and, after processing it, sold it as chewing tobacco. Excise duty under the Cen...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)