Search Results for "MLA interference"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case Due to Lack of Live Link and Inordinate Delay. Order under Section 55(1) set aside as show cause notice issued over a year after last incident and no fresh crime registered during the gap.

The petitioners, Narayan Sitaram Pawar and Shantaram Narayan Pawar, challenged an externment order dated 15.12.2022 passed by the Superintendent of Po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Mid-Term Transfer of Executive Engineer in Public Works Department. Transfer Order Upheld as Administrative Necessity Despite Non-Compliance with Normal Tenure Under Transfers Act.

The petitioner, Mrs. Varsha Mahesh Ghughari, an Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department of Maharashtra, challenged her transfer order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election Petition Allowed for Non-Compliance with Section 16 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. Failure to File Election Expenses Within 30 Days Renders Election Void.

The petitioner, Ashok Rajaram Raul, was declared elected as a councilor from Ward No.12-D of Thane Municipal Corporation in the general elections held...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Notice of Motion for Contempt in Property Dispute. Consent order allowing repairs and maintenance did not prohibit fixing of tiles on terrace, and society's actions were not in breach of the order.

The petitioner, M/s. Chetan Associates, a partnership firm, filed a suit against the respondent, Abhilasha Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd., seeking injunctive r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision Petitions Against Order Allowing Discharge Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Court Holds That Sanction for Prosecution Is Not Required at the Stage of Taking Cognizance Under Section 19 of the PC Act.

The State of Karnataka, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Udupi District, filed two criminal revision petitions under Sections 397 and 401 of the Co...