Search Results for "Kishan Gopal"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony insufficient without independent corroboration.

The appellant, Zaverilal Ramjibhai Gala, was a Chief Engineer with Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB) and was convicted by the Special Judge (ACB), Kutch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Brothers for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Land Dispute. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established as Appellants Acted in Concert with Lethal Weapons.

The appellants, four brothers, were convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for offences under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504 read with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Letters Patent Appeal Filed by Terminated Employees Against Single Judge's Order. Model Standing Orders Dispute: Whether Rule 32 Excludes Clause 4A Protection for Probationers Who Were Initially Trainees.

This Letters Patent Appeal arose from the dismissal of a writ petition by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which had upheld the termination of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petition Challenging Tenant Declaration Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act. Concurrent Findings of Tenancy Based on Landowner's Admission and Long-Standing Cultivation Upheld.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the landowners (petitioners) challenging the judgment and order of the Deputy Collector, L.Rs. Parbhani dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Appointment of Vice Chancellor of University of Mumbai. Court upholds appointment process under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, finding no illegality or mala fides.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and a Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as the Vice Chanc...