Search Results for "Indian Companies Act 1913"

180 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 180 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued to Non-Existent Entity After Amalgamation. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 issued in name of amalgamated company held invalid as entity ceased to exist.

The petitioner, Bennett Coleman and Company Ltd., challenged a notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CSR Expenditure Deduction Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CSR Expenditure Held to Be Incurred Wholly and Exclusively for Business Purposes. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 Quashed as Based on Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Voltas Limited, a company engaged in air conditioning and refrigeration business, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2015-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Partnership Dispute. The Court considered whether to appoint a sole arbitrator for disputes arising from a partnership deed containing multiple arbitration clauses.

The applicants, Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. and Bharat Barrel And Drum Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd., filed two arbitration applications under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging EPF Attachment Over SFC Sale Property. Section 11(2) of EPF Act, 1952 creates overriding first charge on assets, enforceable against purchaser in SFC sale, not limited to insolvency or winding up.

The petitioner, M/s. Indus Agro Products, was a purchaser in a sale conducted by the State Financial Corporation under the State Financial Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure of Goods Under Legal Metrology Act for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Seizure Notice. Failure to Provide 15-Day Notice Under Section 15(2) of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 Renders Seizure Illegal and Goods Must Be Returned.

The petitioners, Cadbury India Ltd. and its shareholder Vijay Madali, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...