Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued to Non-Existent Entity After Amalgamation. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 issued in name of amalgamated company held invalid as entity ceased to exist.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 38
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Bennett Coleman and Company Ltd., challenged a notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2016-17. The notice was addressed to Times Infotainment Media Ltd. (TIML), which had amalgamated with the petitioner pursuant to a scheme sanctioned by the Bombay High Court on 3rd July 2015 with an appointed date of 1st April 2013. The petitioner had informed the Assessing Officer about the amalgamation on 11th May 2016. Despite this, the reassessment notice was issued in the name of TIML, which had ceased to exist. The court considered whether such a notice is valid. The petitioner argued that a notice issued to a non-existent entity is void ab initio. The respondents contended that the notice was valid as it was issued in the name of the entity that had filed the return. The court held that upon amalgamation, the transferor company ceases to exist, and any notice issued in its name is invalid. The court quashed the notice and the reassessment proceedings, relying on the principle that a jurisdictional defect cannot be cured.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment - Notice to Non-Existent Entity - Section 148, Income Tax Act, 1961 - Validity of reassessment notice issued in name of amalgamated company after its dissolution - Petitioner challenged notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under section 148 in the name of Times Infotainment Media Ltd., which had amalgamated with petitioner and ceased to exist - Court held that notice issued to a non-existent entity is void ab initio and cannot be cured - Reassessment proceedings quashed (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued in the name of a company that had amalgamated with another company and ceased to exist is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the reassessment proceedings.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice issued to non-existent entity is invalid
  • Amalgamation results in dissolution of transferor company
  • Notice under section 148 must be issued to existing entity
  • Jurisdictional defect cannot be cured
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (06) 113

WRIT PETITION NO. 2105 OF 2022

2023-06-27

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Kamal Khata

2023:BHC-OS:5702-DB

Jas Sanghavi with Revati S. Nansi for petitioner, Suresh Kumar for respondents

Bennett Coleman and Company Ltd.

Union of India, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging reassessment notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 31st March 2021 and reassessment proceedings

Filing Reason

Notice issued in name of amalgamated company which had ceased to exist

Previous Decisions

Bombay High Court sanctioned scheme of amalgamation on 3rd July 2015

Issues

Whether a reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued in the name of a company that had amalgamated with another company and ceased to exist is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that notice issued to non-existent entity is void ab initio. Respondents argued that notice was valid as it was issued in the name of the entity that had filed the return.

Ratio Decidendi

A reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued in the name of a company that has amalgamated and ceased to exist is void ab initio and cannot be cured, as it is a jurisdictional defect.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner challenges the notice, dated 31st March 2021 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relevant to the assessment year 2016-17 primarily on the ground that the same was issued in the name of Times Infotainment Media Ltd. which is a non-existent entity.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the reassessment notice. The court reserved judgment on 3rd May 2023 and pronounced on 27th June 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Deaths of Housewife and Minor Child. Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Deduction for Passengers in Horse Cart, Awards Future Prospects for Housewife and Minor.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not pervers...