Search Results for "Inadvertent error"

264 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order in Transfer Pricing Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Invalid. Petitioner's Objections to Draft Assessment Order Not Considered, Violating Section 144C of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, SHL (India) Private Limited, an Indian company and part of the SHL Group, United Kingdom, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cenvat Credit Interest Dispute — Reversal Without Utilization Does Not Attract Interest. Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 interpreted to require actual utilization for interest liability.

The appellant, Cipla Limited, a manufacturer of medicaments, was engaged in the manufacture of medicaments containing ethanol (alcohol) which fell out...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Winding-Up Petition, Sets Aside Conditional Deposit Order for Lack of Jurisdiction. Dispute over unpaid dues under the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 cannot be adjudicated in winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order dated 27 September 2017 passed by the learned Company Judge in Company Petition No. 192 of 2016, directing the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Ward-Member Due to Prior Disqualification. Returning Officer's Correction of Inadvertent Acceptance of Nomination Upheld as No Legal Right Accrues from an Illegal Act.

The petitioner, Shri Punjabrao Trambakrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his nomination for the post of Ward-Member in G...