Search Results for "Housing Board Allotment"

192 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 192 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA Housing Allotment — Petitioner's Challenge to Eligibility of Allottees Fails. Court holds that MHADA's decision to allot flats to respondents was within its administrative discretion and not arbitrary under Article 226.

The petitioner, Ved Prakash Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Court Orders in Property Dispute Between Member and Housing Society. Member's claim for plot allotment fails as cancellation by NIT and subsequent sale to third party upheld due to member's failure to construct within stipulated time.

The petitioner, a member of the respondent Nagpur Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., was allotted plot No.122 by the Society, which had obtained 13 plo...