Search Results for "Fragmentation"

162 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 162 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Co-owner's Title in Ancestral Property Despite Consolidation Officer's Order Expunging Name. Section 49 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 Does Not Confer Power to Divest Pre-existing Tenure Holder's Ownership Rights.

The case concerns a dispute over ancestral land in village Mustafabad, Haridwar, originally owned by Angat, who had three sons: Ramji Lal, Khushi Ram,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Consolidation Authority's Order Final and Binding on Civil Court. Section 37 of Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 bars civil suit to challenge consolidation order.

The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for possession and confirmation of title over 0.32 decimal of land in village Kishanpur, Sitamarhi, Bihar. The la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Judicial Officer for Alleged Disregard of Precedents. Court holds that mere erroneous orders or non-mention of cited judgments do not constitute contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Yogesh Waman Athavale, an advocate practicing in Chiplun, filed a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Variation of Consolidation Scheme Under Section 32 of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1948 — Scheme Finalized in 1990 Cannot Be Varied After 29 Years Due to Laches and Lack of Jurisdiction.

The petitioners, Kisan Bhimrao Patil and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Mesne Profits Case — Trial Court's Direction for Enquiry Without Pleadings Set Aside. Direction for mesne profits enquiry under Order XX Rule 12 CPC without any pleadings or prayers in the suit is unsustainable.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, arising from a trial court judgment that included a direction for an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Consolidation Orders Under Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Petitioners Failed to Challenge Earlier Orders in Time, and Subsequent Orders Were Merely Consequential.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a letter dated 2nd February 1990 and a notice dated 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sale of Fragment to Adjacent Owner Under Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. Sale of Fragment to Owner of Adjacent Survey Number is Valid as 'Contiguous Owner' Includes Owner of Adjacent Land.

The petitioner, Balwantrao Bhagwantrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition challenging the sale of a fragment of land (Survey No. 7/1) by respondent No. 1...