Search Results for "Fiscal Statute"

173 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overturns Tribunal Ruling, Declares Assam Resident Indian Citizen. Procedural Unfairness and Insufficient Evidence Lead to Landmark Judgment Ensuring Justice and Upholding Natural Rights

Md. Rahim Ali, declared a foreigner by the Foreigners Tribunal in Nalbari, Assam. Rahim Ali challenged this decision, presenting various pieces of evi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record in Order Granting Time to Pay Deficit Stamp Duty. Review Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Ground Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC for Recall of Judgment.

The Review Petition No.340 of 2019 was filed by Seetharama Shetty (the petitioner/plaintiff) seeking recall of the judgment dated 23.08.2019 passed in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conversion Fees Under Goa Land Revenue Code — Application Date Determines Applicable Rate. Conversion fees must be calculated based on rates prevailing on date of application under Section 32 of Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968, not on date of order.

The petitioner, Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira, along with co-owners, applied on 08.03.2013 under Section 32 of the Goa Daman and Diu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...