Search Results for "Electricity tariff"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Electricity tariff"

177 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 177 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Commission's Order Restricting Depreciation to Actual Supply Period in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Depreciation under Regulation 6.32 of DERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Generation Tariff) Regulations, 2011 cannot be allowed beyond the period of actual supply of electricity to consumers, as consumer interest is paramount under Section 61(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

7 May 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission) against the judgment of the Appellate Tribunal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Power Developer in Mega Power Policy Customs Duty Exemption Dispute — Press Release Not a Binding Policy Change. The court held that a Press Release reducing the capacity threshold for Mega Power Projects from 1000 MW to 700 MW did not create a binding right to customs duty exemption under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the appellant had assumed the risk of policy changes under the RFP.

20 Nov 2024

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 30.06.2014, which dismissed the appeal of Nabha Power Limited...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CGRF Order in Electricity Bill Dispute — Remands for Fresh Consideration on Correct Application of Multiplying Factor. Court holds that CGRF erred in treating the mistake as non-bonafide and in estimating consumption without proper evidence, directing reconsideration in light of Supreme Court precedent.

21 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 15.11.2022 passed by the Consumer Griev...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Captive Power Producers in Hydel Policy Dispute Over Water Royalty Charges. The court held that the agreements incorporating the government policy did not impose water royalty liability on captive power producers, distinguishing them from independent power producers under the policy framework.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by M/s. Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSIL) and Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) against a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL Petition Against CGRF Interest Order in Tariff Refund Dispute. Interest on Differential Tariff Amount Not Payable Absent Specific Provision in Regulations or Agreement.

17 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 25 January 2018 passed by the Consumer ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Carrying Cost in Change in Law Claims Under PPA — Restitutionary Principle Upheld. Article 13.2 of Power Purchase Agreement Entitles Generating Company to Carrying Cost from Date of Change in Law Till Approval.

25 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (Haryana Discoms) and Gujarat Urja Vika...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice in Electricity Billing Dispute — Petitioner Agro Industry Challenged Retrospective Reclassification and Demand for Arrears Under HT-2(A) Tariff. Court Held That Reclassification Without Prior Notice and Retrospective Application of Tariff Was Unlawful and Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.

7 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s Sri Balaji Agro Industries, is an agro-based industry located at Chicksugur Industrial Growth Center, Raichur. The respondent, GES...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BESCOM Demand Notices for Alleged Theft of Electricity Due to Lack of Evidence of Tampering. Meter found to be in working condition and no pilferage detected, demand set aside as arbitrary.

28 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Vishwas Concrete Products Private Limited, is a company engaged in the business of running a concrete mixing industrial unit. It had t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge to Sale of Captive Power to Third Party Without Licence Under Electricity Act, 2003. Captive Generating Plant Not Required to Obtain Licence for Sale to Another Industrial Consumer Under Section 9 Read With Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

4 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulator...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)