Search Results for "Distribution Licensee"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Electricity Board's Appeals in Illegal Disconnection Case — Board Cannot Claim Charges for Period of Its Own Wrongful Act. Initial Disconnection Without Considering Consumer's Instalment Request Violates Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Bihar State Electricity Board (appellant) and M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (respondent/company) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge to Sale of Captive Power to Third Party Without Licence Under Electricity Act, 2003. Captive Generating Plant Not Required to Obtain Licence for Sale to Another Industrial Consumer Under Section 9 Read With Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulator...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Mehandi Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Sanction order found to be cyclostyled proforma without application of mind, rendering prosecution invalid.

The applicants, Chutararam and Jetharam Gehlot, were the proprietors of 'Prem Mehandi Center', a small manufacturer of henna/mehandi powder and cone p...