Search Results for "DRT Procedure Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "DRT Procedure Rules"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in SARFAESI Act Recovery Case, Reiterates Limited Scope of Article 226 in Private Financial Disputes. The Court held that the High Court cannot entertain writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act actions when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available, and the interim arrangement by the Supreme Court did not confer jurisdiction to decide merits after DRT became functional.

17 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals by a lender bank against orders of the Kerala High Court that entertained writ petitions filed by borrowers (respondents) ch...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Matter — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Examine Validity of Sale Notice Where Fraud or Irregularity Alleged. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act does not oust civil court jurisdiction when the challenge is based on fraud or violation of statutory provisions.

12 Aug 2022

The appellants, plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Interim Stay in IBC Matter — Questions of Maintainability of Writ Petition and NCLT's Power to Inquire into Fraud Examined. The court held that the High Court should not have entertained a writ petition against an NCLT order when a statutory appeal to NCLAT was available, and that NCLT can inquire into fraud under Section 60(5)(c) of IBC, 2016.

3 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court heard three appeals arising from an interim order of the Karnataka High Court staying the operation of a direction by the National C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IDBI Bank's Appeal in Winding Up Case — Revival of Winding Up Proceedings Set Aside and Sale Deed Directed to Be Executed. Agreement to Sell Not Fraudulent Preference Under Section 531 of Companies Act, 1956 as Executed Beyond Six-Month Period and Bona Fide.

17 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered two appeals by IDBI Bank (erstwhile United Western Bank) against judgments of the Madras High Court relating to the windi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Securitisation Application Matter. Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act Against Interim Orders of Debts Recovery Tribunal Upheld.

27 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Trishul Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Case — Appeal Under Section 18 Held Maintainable Despite Availability of Civil Suit. Statutory Remedy Under SARFAESI Act Cannot Be Ousted by Alternative Remedy of Civil Suit.

27 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Trishul Developers, a partnership firm, had availed a loan from L & T Housing Finance Limited (respondent No.1). Upon default, the res...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order on Condonation of Delay in Review Application — Limitation for Review Under Section 17 of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 Governed by Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

3 May 2019

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors and Borrowers. Court Holds That Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act Provides an Alternative Remedy to Challenge Possession Notices and That Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Should Not Be Entertained When Statutory Remedy Is Available.

5 Jul 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11th September 2015 passed by the Chief Metr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition for Commission on Guarantees Issued to Court — Canara Bank Entitled to 3% Commission on Guarantees in Favour of Prothonotary and Senior Master. The court held that a bank issuing guarantees at the request of a customer is entitled to commission as per its standard terms, and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal erred in denying such commission.

6 May 2014

The petitioner, Canara Bank, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, filed a wr...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)