Search Results for "Court fee valuation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Court fee valuation"

272 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 272 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Held That Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Court Fees Issue Was Curable. The Court restored the suit for trial, emphasizing that the High Court impermissibly conducted a mini-trial at the threshold stage.

21 Apr 2026

The appellant, M/s. Marg Limited, a real estate developer, purchased land in Chennai in 2002 and constructed a commercial IT building. In 2011 and 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decrees Suit in Favour of Financial Advisor in Commercial Summary Suit for Professional Fees — Interpretation of Mandate Letter Options for Success Fee on Cash Sales of NPAs. Court holds that where the Bank exercised option of 100% cash sales, the Financial Advisor is entitled to success fee at the higher rate of 0.50% on cash received, as per option (a) of the Mandate Letter dated 1 July 2017.

25 Feb 2025

The Plaintiff, Special Situation Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in providing financial adviso...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Eviction Suit — Proper Court Fee Paid Under Section 41(2) of KCF & SV Act. Suit for Ejectment of Tenant Valued at Rs.7,15,000/- Based on Annual Rent and Premium, Held to Be Correctly Valued Under Section 41(2) of Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

15 Feb 2024

The respondent, claiming to be the owner of the suit schedule property and alleging that the petitioners are tenants, filed O.S.No.256/2016 before the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Cancellation of Release Deed — Plaint Not Liable for Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as Cause of Action Disclosed. Allegations of Fraud and Misrepresentation in Obtaining Release Deed Constitute a Valid Cause of Action, and the Court Cannot Look into Defense at the Stage of Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

23 Jun 2023

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the plaintiff (respondent herein) seeking cancellation of a registered release deed dated 01.07.2019, alleg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee in Suit for Annulment of Compromise Decree. Court Fee Refund Granted Under Section 66(2)(a) of Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 When Compromise Decree Is Set Aside.

30 Jun 2021

The petitioners, L. Dayananda Reddy and Gayathri D., filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challengi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Customs Appeal on Valuation of Imported Goods Under Customs Act, 1962 — Design and Supervision Charges Not Addable to Transaction Value. The Court held that costs for post-importation activities like erection, commissioning, and performance guarantee tests are not includible in the assessable value of imported goods under Rule 4 read with Rule 9(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

27 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata, and Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) regarding the valuation ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Valuation of Suit for Declaration and Injunction Under Karnataka Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1958 — Suit for Declaration That Sale Deed Is Null and Void Is Properly Valued Under Section 26(c) Read with Section 24(d) of the Act.

24 Apr 2015

The defendant filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.7.2013 passed by the I Addit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired House Based on Expert Evidence. Reference Court's award of Rs. 6 per sq. ft. for built-up area and Rs. 3 per sq. ft. for open space upheld as just and proper under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

7 Mar 2011

The appellant, Masaji s/o Gyanoji Thoke, owned and possessed House No. 133 in village Borja, Taluka Kalamnuri, District Parbhani. The house was acquir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Valuation of Suit for Court Fees in Property Dispute. Court holds that where a sale deed is challenged as void ab initio, the plaintiff need not pay ad valorem court fees on the market value of the property, and the suit is properly valued under Section 6(iv)(j) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

28 Sep 2010

The petitioner, original defendant No.1, challenged the valuation of the suit for the purpose of payment of court fees. The respondents, original plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Objection to Court Fee and Valuation in Suit for Declaration of Title. Court holds that valuation for court fee and jurisdiction under Section 6(iv) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 is based on market value of property, not plaintiff's share, and that the suit is properly valued.

22 Sep 2010

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit for declaration of title, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cha...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)