Search Results for "Consumer Welfare Fund"

49 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Share Valuation, Awards Interest at 6% Pre-Decree and 9% Post-Decree in Decades-Old Dispute. Balancing Equity and Commercial Realities: SC Modifies Interest Rates in Rajasthan State Mines Share Acquisition Case

Valuation of Shares – The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court’s valuation of shares at ₹640 per share, rejecting the State’s objections. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Judicial Immunity and IBC Proceedings as Abuse of Process. Challenge to Section 3 of Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 and Section 7 of IBC held to be frivolous and not maintainable.

The petitioner, Mrs. Manisha Nimesh Mehta, as promoter and guarantor of M/s. Perfect Infraengineers Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Contractual Employee for Maternity Benefit under Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. Denial of maternity benefit to a woman on contractual basis held unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Archana Dahifale, was employed as a Project Officer on a contractual basis with the respondent No.2 Institute since 2015. Her contract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax Paid by Non-Resident Despite Revenue's Appeal — Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable. Service Tax Refund Ordered as Stay Application Dismissed and Tax Paid by Appellant Itself, Not Collected from Others.

The appellant, M/s Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd., a non-resident service provider, paid service tax under protest for the period 10.09.2004 to 31.12.2004. Af...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax Paid by Non-Resident for Period Prior to Amendment — Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable. Service Tax Liability for Period 10.09.2004 to 31.12.2004 Not Attracted as Reverse Charge Mechanism Introduced Only from 01.01.2005 Under Finance Act, 1994.

The appellant, M/s Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd., a non-resident service provider, had paid service tax for the period 10.09.2004 to 31.12.2004 under the Fin...