Search Results for "Concurrent findings of fact"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition in Rent Default and Subletting Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Article 227. Consent Decree Rent Treated as Standard Rent; Subletting Proved by Documentary Evidence.

The petitioner, a partnership firm, was a tenant in a building owned by the respondents. The building was demolished and reconstructed, and the tenant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Tenant's claim of possession based on purchase of shed and payment of rent rejected as findings of fact by courts below were not perverse or without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Laxman N. Deshmukh, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 394 of 1983 before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satara, seeking possession of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree Under Section 13A(1) of Bombay Rent Act for Bona Fide Requirement of Landlord's Son. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interferable Under Section 115 CPC as No Jurisdictional Error Found.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the eviction decree pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sub-Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Eviction Case. Concurrent findings of fact that sub-tenant was not in occupation prior to 1st February 1973, thus not entitled to protection under Section 15A of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947.

The present petition was filed by a sub-tenant, Baburao Laxman Kshatriya (deceased, represented by his legal heir Smt. Kesharbai Baburao Kshatriya), c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Encroachment and Title. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent findings of fact are not perverse.

The case involves two cross suits between Chandrakant Ramchandra Godhvinde (appellant) and Anna Bhau Lone (respondent) concerning a property admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Money Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant failed to prove that the suit claim was not established, as both courts below found the plaintiff's case credible.

The case involves a money suit filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original defendant) for recovery of Rs. 9165/- with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Adverse Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that claim of adverse possession must be proved with clear and unequivocal evidence of hostile possession for the statutory period.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (now appellants) against the judgment of the lower Appellate Court which dismissed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

This is a second appeal arising from a civil suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction. The appellant, Parubai Savliram Kshatriya (si...