Search Results for "Chief Settlement Commissioner jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Chief Settlement Commissioner jurisdiction"

370 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 370 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Village Recognition Dispute — Inter-District Boundary Dispute Not a Valid Ground to Keep Recognition in Abeyance. Formal recognition of a village cannot be withheld indefinitely pending resolution of an inter-district boundary dispute where the village has fulfilled all other criteria under the O.M. dated 22.03.1996 and O.M. dated 01.10.2005.

23 May 2025

The dispute pertains to the recognition of a village in Nagaland. The appellant, Old Jalukai Village Council, opposed the recognition of respondent no...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Court holds that prior sanction is mandatory for prosecution of public servants for offences under Sections 13(1)(c) and 13(2) of the Act, and failure to obtain it vitiates the proceedings.

28 Feb 2025

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by public servants seeking quashing of FIR No.22/2018 registered by the Karnataka Lokayukta Police...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust Regarding Tender Process and Price Bid Opening. Petitioner Challenges Disqualification and Award of Contract to Third Respondent Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

18 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/s.Coresonant Systems Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender floated by V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust, Tuticorin, for implementation of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Revisionary Authority on Jurisdiction Ground. Cause of Action Arises at Place of Revisionary Authority's Office Under Article 226(2) of Constitution of India, Not Where Original Adjudication Order Was Passed.

5 Sep 2024

The Bombay High Court dealt with a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of six writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revision...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Evacuee Property Dispute, Upholding Sale of Specified Area Under Displaced Persons Act. Property Transfer Limited to Area in Sale Certificate and Conveyance Deed, with Additional Areas Requiring Payment as per Chief Settlement Commissioner's Orders Under Section 24(1).

24 Jan 2024

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a property dispute concerning 'Spring Field', an evacuee property in Shimla. The appellants, legal heir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Customs Duty Case — Petitioner's Full Disclosure and Cooperation Justifies Settlement. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Application for Non-Disclosure of Additional Amounts Set Aside as Unreasonable Under Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962.

15 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of vehicles in India. It filed four applications before the Settlement Commiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Under Section 32(3) of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Deputy Director Lacked Jurisdiction to Reopen Final Consolidation Scheme After 30 Years. The court held that once a certificate under Section 22 is issued, the scheme attains finality and cannot be reopened under Section 32(3) except for clerical errors.

13 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Padmabai Narayan Chaudhary and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Au...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Suit Maintainability in Land Declaration Dispute After Finding Notice Under Section 80 CPC by Karta Sufficient for Divided Coparceners. Karta’s Notice Given While Family Joint Held to Enure for Benefit of All Coparceners Despite Subsequent Partition, as Substantial Identity Existed Between Notice-Giver and Plaintiffs under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

11 Mar 1969

The dispute arose from a declaratory suit filed by Beohar Rajendra Sinha and his three grandsons against the State of Madhya Pradesh seeking a declara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Mutation Entry Validity. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that the Civil Court's decree regarding possession was binding on revenue authorities.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a land dispute between the petitioners (legal heirs of Dattu Appa Patil) and respondent 3 (Rama Yesaba Patil) over mutation entries ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)