Search Results for "CIDCO land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "CIDCO land"

243 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 243 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Lease for Delay in Hotel Construction Due to Economic Slowdown and Infrastructure Delays. Extension of Time Granted Without Additional Premium Under Agreement to Lease.

13 Mar 2025

The petitioners, M/s. PVP Star Hotels Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

3 May 2023

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows De-amalgamation of Plots in CIDCO Area — Rejection Order Quashed. Held that Note 5 below Table-3 of the General Development Control Regulations does not prohibit de-amalgamation of plots falling in Category 8, and the authority must consider the application on merits without imposing a blanket bar.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioners, Anupam Harnath Goyal (aged 80) and his wife Kamal (aged 71), owned two adjacent plots (283 and 284) in Sector N-3, CIDCO, Aurangabad....

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 on Grounds of Non-Compliance with LARR Act, 2013. Petitioners Alleged That Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and That Procedural Irregularities Vitiated the Notifications.

20 Dec 2017

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Jalna, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Petition Against Gram Panchayat Tax Demand Following Precedent. Lease Agreement for Service Charges Does Not Exempt Property from Municipal Taxes Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

8 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), filed a writ petition challenging the demand of property tax by the Gram Panchayat Kalundre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petitioners' Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Non-Compliance with Lok Adalat Settlement Alleged. Court Examines Whether Mandamus Should Issue to Enforce Settlement and Dispose Pending Section 28-A Applications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

24 Mar 2022

The dispute concerned land acquisition for the New Bombay Project. Petitioners, agriculturists from village Roadpali, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in TDR Case — Principle of Land Division Proportionate to Built-Up Area Applicable When TDR Distributed Across Layout. The Court set aside the Competent Authority's order granting conveyance of 929.84 sq.mtrs and remanded for fresh consideration under Section 11(3) of MOFA, holding that GR dated 22 June 2018 does not mandate conveyance of only plinth and appurtenant area.

25 Jun 2026

The Petitioner, Neelkanth Mansions & Infrastructure Private Limited, is a developer of a large integrated project named 'Neelkanth Greens' at Majiwada...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge by L-2 Bidder to Tender Qualification of L-1 Bidder in Underground Cable Conversion Work. Petition alleges that rival L-1 bidder did not meet mandatory tender conditions and that tendering authority's decision was arbitrary and irrational, invoking principles of judicial review in public procurement.

10 Mar 2023

Bombay High Court addressed a writ petition filed by Universal Cables Ltd., the L-2 bidder, challenging CIDCO's decision to declare BNC Power Projects...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Cancellation of Tender Process for Lease of Plots. Court holds that CIDCO's decision to cancel tender without valid reasons and without issuing show-cause notice to highest bidders is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

20 Apr 2023

The petitioners, M/s. Aditya Enterprises and Mahaavir Superstructures Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challenging the decision of the City and Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Cancellation of Lease for Entertainment Complex in Navi Mumbai. Unilateral Rescission of Agreement Without Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

30 Jun 2006

The petitioners, M/s. Popcorn Entertainment and M/s. Platinum Entertainment, were allotted plots of land by the City and Industrial Development Corpor...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)