Search Results for "Buldana District Order"

196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement Between Parties. Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC invoked to quash proceedings under Sections 498A, 506, 504 IPC where parties settled and resumed cohabitation.

The applicants, eight family members including the husband, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Whether Aurangabad Court Had Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for Property in Hingoli. District Court Held It Lacked Jurisdiction; Appeal Outcome Not Provided.

The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s Kasliwal Empire, formed by the appellant and respondent on 7.3.2007 for developing housing projects. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation to Rs.1,00,000 per Hectare. Reference Court's failure to consider potential for development and higher potential value leads to inadequate compensation under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the claimants (legal heirs of Bakshi Kanhu Rathod) against the judgment and order dated 18.3.1996 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Son's Encroachment on Government Land. The term 'person' under Section 14(1)(j3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 includes legal representatives of the encroacher.

The petitioner, Sau. Anita Laxman Junghare, was the Sarpanch and a member of Gram Panchayat, Nagapura. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 filed a complaint alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of APMC Chairman Challenging Removal — Show-Cause Notice Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act Must Specify Charges. Removal Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as Notice Was Vague and No Proper Hearing Was Given.

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, was a member and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur. He was served with a show-c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation for Percolation Dam Acquisition. Consistency with Connected Appeal Leads to Enhanced Rate of Rs.21,400 per Hectare with Statutory Benefits Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a first appeal by the original landowner (now represented by legal heirs) against the judgment and award dated 14.11.1994 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation Based on Comparable Sale Deed. Market value of acquired land determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare relying on sale instance of adjacent land with similar potential.

The appeal arises from a land acquisition proceeding initiated by the State of Maharashtra for acquiring land bearing Survey No. 6/1 admeasuring 99 R ...