Search Results for "Building plan sanction"

369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Jaipur Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Conversion Charges Refund Case — Land Use Change Required Payment Under Section 173-A of Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959. Court Holds That Conversion Charges Were Validly Demanded and Respondents Not Entitled to Refund.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Jaipur Municipal Corporation against a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Notice Under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Is Required Before Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by residents of Shirdi challenging the demolition of their structures by the Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act - Reservation for Garden Purposes Deemed Lapsed Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period

The petitioners, owners of final plot No.481 in Town Planning Scheme No.1 at Karad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.

The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that IOD does not confer immunity from action for illegal construction beyond sanctioned plans under MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellant, Parvez M. Yusuf, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai under Section 53(1) of the Mah...