Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act - Reservation for Garden Purposes Deemed Lapsed Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 17
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, owners of final plot No.481 in Town Planning Scheme No.1 at Karad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the reservation/designation bearing No.46 on their land in the sanctioned development plan of Karad Municipal Council had lapsed. The land, admeasuring 1721.16 square meters, was reserved for a garden. The petitioners contended that the reservation was made in the development plan sanctioned on 29th January 1999, and despite the lapse of more than 10 years, the respondent Municipal Council had not acquired the land nor taken any steps for acquisition. The respondents argued that the reservation was part of the final development plan and that the petitioners had not issued a purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The Court examined the provisions of Section 127, which stipulates that if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within 10 years from the date of the reservation, the reservation lapses and the land is deemed to be released. The Court noted that the development plan was sanctioned on 29th January 1999, and the reservation had not been acquired within the statutory period. The Court rejected the respondents' argument regarding the purchase notice, holding that the lapsing occurs automatically by operation of law. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation had lapsed and directing the Municipal Council to issue a revised final plot certificate and development permission to the petitioners within three months.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Lapsing of Reservation - Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - The petitioners sought declaration that reservation on their land for garden purposes had lapsed as the acquiring authority failed to acquire the land within 10 years from the date of reservation. The Court held that since no steps for acquisition were taken within the statutory period, the reservation stood lapsed and the land was deemed released. (Paras 1-10)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The Court exercised its writ jurisdiction to declare the reservation lapsed and directed the Municipal Council to issue a revised final plot certificate and development permission. (Paras 11-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation on the petitioners' land under the development plan has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 due to non-acquisition within the prescribed period.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition, declaring that the reservation on the petitioners' land has lapsed and the land is deemed to be released from reservation. The respondent No.1 Municipal Council is directed to issue a revised final plot certificate and development permission to the petitioners within three months.

Law Points

  • Reservation lapses if not acquired within 10 years from date of reservation
  • Section 127 of MRTP Act
  • 1966
  • Deemed release from reservation
  • Writ jurisdiction under Article 226
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018:BHC-AS:23833-DB

Writ Petition No.3229 of 2011

2018-08-29

Ranjit More, Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai

2018:BHC-AS:23833-DB

Mr. Girish S. Godbole with Mr. A. M. Kulkarni and Mr. Sarthak Diwan for petitioners; Mrs. R. M. Shinde, AGP for State; Mr. Vikram Chavan I/b. Ms. Niharika Waradkar for respondent No.1

Sou. Hasina Kudbuddin Shaikh and Others

Karad Municipal Council and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking declaration that reservation on land has lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that reservation/designation No.46 on the said land has lapsed and the property is deemed released from reservation, making it available for development.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' land was reserved for garden in the development plan sanctioned on 29th January 1999, but the Municipal Council failed to acquire it within 10 years.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the petitioners' land under the development plan has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to non-acquisition within 10 years.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: The reservation was made in 1999 and no acquisition steps were taken within 10 years, hence the reservation lapsed automatically. Respondents: The reservation is part of the final development plan and the petitioners did not issue a purchase notice under Section 127.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within 10 years from the date of reservation, the reservation lapses automatically by operation of law, and the land is deemed to be released from reservation. The failure to issue a purchase notice does not prevent the lapsing.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners claim to be the owners of final plot No.481, Town Planning Scheme No.1 at Karad admeasuring about 1721.16 square meters. The reservation/designation bearing No.46 on the said land in the sanctioned development plan of the respondent No.1-Karad Municipal Council has lapsed and the said property is deemed to have been released from the said reservation/designation.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.3229 of 2011 before the Bombay High Court seeking declaration of lapsing of reservation. The petition was reserved for judgment on 2nd August 2018 and pronounced on 29th August 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 127
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions Challenging School Tribunal's Order Quashing Termination of Teacher. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Earlier Enquiries Are Quashed for Non-Compliance of Rules 36/37 of MEPS Rules, 1981 Are Impermissi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Order Allowing Amendment of Plaint in Partition Suit. Amendment Sought After Trial Was Almost Over, Held Unnecessary and Belated Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.