Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

294 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Quashing Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act. Trust Not Registered on Tillers Day Cannot Claim Exemption; Tenants' Rights Vest on 1st April 1957.

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural lands owned by a public trust, challenged a certificate of exemption granted under Section 88-B of the Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Orders in Tenancy Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Tenant's Default in Rent Payment for Three Years Warrants Eviction Under Section 25(2) of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The dispute concerned agricultural lands bearing Survey Nos. 24/2A and 24/2B, originally leased by the landlord’s predecessor to the tenant’s pred...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Land Possession Dispute Under Section 33B of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlords' Certificate of Exemption Under Section 88C Upheld, Personal Cultivation Need Established.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners, who are the heirs of the original tenant Kondiba Dnyanu Dongale, and the respondents, who are the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Land Transfer Without Previous Sanction Under Section 43 of Bombay Tenancy Act. Post-transfer sanction cannot regularize invalid transfer; MRT order set aside.

The petitioner, Smt. Saraswati Shamrao Dhere, was a tenant of half portion of agricultural land in Shiroli, Kolhapur. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were ten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Remand for Fixing Purchase Price Under Section 32H of Bombay Tenancy Act. Tenant's Right to Purchase Land Upheld as Tenancy Findings Had Attained Finality and Land Had Turned Rayatava Under Section 88.

The petitioner, Sidappa Padmanna Berad, a former Sanadi Inamdar, filed a writ petition challenging the appellate order of the Special Land Acquisition...