Search Results for "Bombay Prohibition Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Bombay Prohibition Rules"

1281 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1281 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

17 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Distillery Petitions Challenging Denial of NOC for Ethanol Production Under Maharashtra Excise Act. Court holds that denial of No Objection Certificate for ethanol production from sugarcane juice is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 when based on policy not applicable to molasses-based distilleries.

9 Aug 2023

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by distilleries challenging the denial of No Objection Certificate (NOC) by the State of Maharasht...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Blue Flag Beach Notification for Miramar Beach — Environmental Clearance Dispensation Upheld as Reasonable. Court holds that the notification dated 12.07.2019 permitting structures for Blue Flag certification on 12 beaches, including Miramar, is valid and not arbitrary, as it balances environmental protection with tourism development.

27 Aug 2021

The petitioners, eight residents of Goa, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging a notification dated 12.07.2019 issued by the Union of India u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Bearings in IPR Suspension Case — Mandamus Issued for Violation of IPR Rules 2007. Customs Authorities Suspended Clearance Without Confiscation Order or Notice Under Rule 7 of IPR Rules, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

12 Mar 2021

The petitioners, NBU Bearings Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Airport Authority of India's NOC Denial for Building Construction Near Airport. Court holds that the Appellate Committee's order rejecting NOC for construction near Mumbai airport was arbitrary and unsustainable, and remits the matter for fresh consideration.

3 Jul 2020

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Kalpataru Ltd. and United Industrial House Premises Co. Soc. Ltd. (along with Klassik Homes Pvt. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Council of Architecture's Appeal, Upholds That Section 37 of Architects Act Only Prohibits Use of Title 'Architect'. Government Posts Titled 'Architect' Can Be Held by Unregistered Individuals as the Act Does Not Prohibit Practice of Architecture.

17 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment that Section 37 of the Architects Act, 1972 only prohibits unregister...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Pan Masala Manufacturers in Challenge to Maharashtra Gutka Ban — Petitioners Allowed to Continue Manufacturing Outside State Pending Final Hearing. Court Found Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favour of Petitioners Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

15 Sep 2012

The petitioners, companies engaged in the manufacture, supply, and distribution of pan masala containing tobacco (gutka) and pan masala not containing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking to Restrain Former Additional Judges from Practicing in Lower Courts. Article 220 of the Constitution does not apply to Additional Judges who resigned before confirmation, as they are not 'permanent Judges' within the meaning of the provision.

2 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Nitin Shankar Deshpande, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking to restrain Respondents 5 to 9, who were ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Ban on Gutka and Pan Masala Containing Tobacco or Nicotine Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — Manufacturers' Challenge Dismissed. The court held that the definition of 'food' under Section 3(1)(j) of the FSS Act includes substances for chewing, and that the ban on food products containing tobacco or nicotine is valid and not ultra vires.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, manufacturers and sellers of gutka and pan masala containing tobacco or nicotine, challenged the validity of the ban imposed by the C...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)