Search Results for "Bombay Agricultural Produce Market Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Bombay Agricultural Produce Market Act"

306 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SIT Investigation into Market Committee Affairs. Government Order Appointing Special Investigating Team for Inquiry into Alleged Irregularities in Agricultural Produce Market Committee Upheld as Valid Exercise of Statutory Power.

10 Sep 2025

The petitioners, who were executive committee members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Nagpur, challenged a Government order dated 18/07/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Special Land Acquisition Officer to Determine Compensation for Land Acquired for Agricultural Produce Market Committee Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Compromise Terms Binding on Parties. The court held that the SLAO must pass a fresh award as per the compromise recorded in Writ Petition No. 2285 of 1992, failing which the petitioners could seek additional compensation in civil court.

19 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Radhabai wd/o Purushottam Mallawat and Ashish s/o Purushottam Mallawat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for APMC Election Under Amended Ordinance. The court held that an Ordinance amending Section 13(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulations) Act, 1963, which allowed any agriculturist to contest elections even if not a voter, applied to the ongoing election process, and the rejection of the petitioner's nomination was invalid.

12 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Sow. Laxmibai Vishwanath Gaware, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her nomination form for the election to the Agricu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction Against Dispossession. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Suit for Possession Based on Title Was Barred by Limitation.

13 Apr 2022

The present First Appeal arises from a judgment of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, in S.C. Suit No.5551/1990, where the suit was decreed in favor of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Cotton Federation in Market Fees Dispute — State Procurement Agency Held Liable to Pay Market and Supervision Fees Under APMC Act. The Court ruled that the appellant, acting as a government agent for cotton procurement, is a 'trader' under Section 2(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and must pay fees on purchases from the market area.

11 Jan 2018

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Divisional Manager and Sub Divisional Manager of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Cotton Grow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 45(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963. Show-cause notice under Section 45(1) must specify charges and opportunity of hearing must be granted before superseding the Board.

25 Apr 2017

The petitioners, who were the elected Board of Directors of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malegaon, challenged the order of the District ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Members Due to Availability of Alternative Statutory Remedy Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. The Court Held That Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Nomination and Counting Cannot Be Adjudicated in Writ Jurisdiction and Directed Petitioners to Avail Election Petition Remedy.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioners, who were candidates in the election for members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Kamptee, filed a writ petition under Ar...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — No Enhancement of Compensation for Acquired Land. Appellants failed to prove entitlement to enhanced market value of Rs.2500 per sq. metre under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

7 Apr 2015

The appellants, owners of land acquired for road construction in Margao, Goa, challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer at R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

8 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Purshottam Tonpe, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Mahakal. Subsequently, he contested and won election to the Agriculture P...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)