Search Results for "Bihar Tenancy Act"

77 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maintainability of Civil Revision Against Director's Order Under Section 66(7) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act. Order of Director of Panchayats under Section 66(7) is final and binding, and no Civil Revision lies under Section 201-B of the Act.

The petitioner, Competent Automobiles Company Ltd., applied for a licence to construct a Beach Resort at village Arossim, Goa, based on a technical cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree — Court Receiver Need Not Seek Separate Leave to Sue When Appointed with Full Powers Under Order 40 Rule 1(d) CPC. Notice Under Section 106 T.P. Act Demanding Immediate Possession Is Not Invalid If Suit Filed After Notice Period.

The plaintiff, the Court Receiver appointed by the High Court in Suit No.234 of 1987, was the receiver of the suit property 'Dev Ashish' at Peddar Roa...