Search Results for "Article 110"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Article 110"

2196 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2196 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Pension from Retired Scientists — Recovery Without Notice Violates Natural Justice and Is Barred by CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972

7 Apr 2016

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by retired scientists and employees of the Central Silk Board and its research institutes, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Discriminatory Pension Revision for Teachers Retired Between 1996-2005. State Government's Resolution dated 27-02-2009 held arbitrary and violative of Article 14 for denying revised pension benefits to teachers who retired during the period 01-01-1996 to 31-12-2005.

2 Feb 2024

The petitioners, an association of superannuated teachers governed by the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, challenged the State Gover...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

30 Oct 2015

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Remands Case for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Limitation and Adverse Possession. The court held that the suit for partition is governed by Article 110 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

4 Aug 2016

The case involves a partition suit filed by Pandurang Sitaram Pande (original plaintiff) against his brothers and other family members for a 1/5th sha...

High Court

KAHC010026042017_1

9 Mar 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Procedure Under Chapter VIII CrPC — Police Officers Acting as Special Executive Magistrates Must Follow Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Court Directs Strict Compliance with Sections 107, 111, 112, 116, 117 and 122 and Prohibits Unauthorized Detention and Misconduct.

7 Jun 2006

The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the practice and procedure followed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of IGST Act Provisions on Intermediary Services in Third Judge Reference. The court considered whether Section 13(8)(b) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which deems the place of supply of intermediary services as the location of the supplier, is constitutionally valid and within legislative competence.

18 Apr 2023

The matter involved two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13(8)(b) and Section 8(2) of th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge by CFS Operators to Customs Public Notices. Petition Under Article 226 Seeks Quashing of Notices Allegedly Imposing Unlawful Restrictions on Container Freight Stations.

5 Jun 2017

The petitioners, comprising thirteen Container Freight Station (CFS) operators and thirteen individual directors, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Perpetual Injunction. Court holds that pleas of ownership and adverse possession are contradictory and long possession without lawful basis does not attract presumption under Section 110, Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

5 May 2025

The dispute concerned a suit plot, part of gat no.147 in village Asankhede, Jalgaon district, claimed by the plaintiff (appellant) through generations...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.

8 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)