Search Results for "Age relaxation"

475 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 475 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Examination Board to Consider Promotion of Disabled Student Based on Preparatory Exam Marks. Student with Osteogenesis Imperfecta and 75% Disability Seeks Exemption from Final SSLC Examination.

The petitioner, Master Bharath S., a minor student aged 16 years, represented by his father, was studying in Standard X at Bharat Vidyaniketan School,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Examines Validity of Age Limit and Subject-wise Vacancy in Law Assistant Professor Recruitment. Challenge to G.O.Ms.No.233 and Notification No.1/2025 Alleging Contravention of UGC Regulations, 2018.

The petitioner, having obtained an L.L.M. degree and cleared the NET examination, intended to apply for the post of Assistant Professor (Law) in Gover...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds No Reservation for Professor Posts in UP Medical Colleges Due to Insufficient Vacancies Per Department. Age Limit Enhancement from 45 to 65 Years Upheld as Consistent with MCI Regulations.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging an advertisement for direct recruitment to 47 posts of Professor in Government Medical Colleges in Utt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Selected Candidate in Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education Recruitment Case. Power of Relaxation Under Rule 18 of R&P Rules Upheld for Candidate with Higher Qualification and Highest Merit Score Despite Lack of Prescribed Work Experience.

The present appeals arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education for the post of Computer Hardware Eng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Regularization of Casual Workers. Regularization of Seniors Upheld but Direction for Absorption in Other Establishments Set Aside.

The Union of India appealed against a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which upheld a direction of the Central Administrative Tribunal to regulari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...