High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Hostel Superintendents' Petitions for Appointment Approval — Relaxation of D.Ed. Qualification by Government Resolutions. Court Holds that H.S.C. Qualification Sufficed and Grants Approval from Original Appointment Dates, Following Precedent and Considering 20 Years of Service.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, decided two writ petitions filed by Hostel Superintendents seeking appointment approvals from specific dates. The petitioners had been appointed as Hostel Superintendents in Adivasi Ashram Schools, the first petitioner from 30/9/1999 and the second from 1/7/1998. They sought approval from 1/5/2001 and 1/5/2003 respectively. The State of Maharashtra had earlier prescribed D.Ed. as an additional qualification for Hostel Superintendents. However, the Government Resolution dated 5/2/2000 by the Vimukta Jati, Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Class and Special Backward Category Welfare Department relaxed this requirement, making H.S.C. the eligibility criteria with preference for B.P.Ed. degree holders. Subsequently, the State issued another Government Resolution dated 3/6/2008, which expressly relaxed the D.Ed. qualification condition. The petitioners possessed H.S.C. or higher qualifications, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader did not dispute that H.S.C. was the requisite qualification, with D.Ed. being merely given weightage. The court noted that a similar writ petition, Writ Petition No.5713/2003 in the matter of Narayan Kishanrao Bhise Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, had been allowed by this court on 18/10/2016, relying on the Government Resolution dated 3/6/2008. In the present cases, interim relief had been granted on 10/2/2005, and pursuant to that, the respondents had issued provisional approval orders on 23/9/2005 and released the petitioners' salaries. The petitioners had been discharging their duties for almost 20 years. The court found that in light of the Government Resolution dated 5/2/2000, the petitioners were eligible for appointment from the outset, and the subsequent resolution dated 3/6/2008 affirmed the relaxation. Consequently, the court allowed both writ petitions, granting approval from 1/5/2001 and 1/5/2003 as prayed for, and confirmed the interim orders. Rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Appointment - Relaxation of Educational Qualifications - Government Resolutions dated 5.2.2000 and 3.6.2008 - The court held that Hostel Superintendents are entitled to appointment approval from the dates of their initial appointments based on H.S.C. qualification as the D.Ed. qualification was relaxed by the State Government. The court followed its earlier decision in Narayan Kishanrao Bhise v. State of Maharashtra, which recognized the relaxation, and directed approval from 1/5/2001 and 1/5/2003 respectively. (Paras 2-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to appointment approvals as Hostel Superintendents from 1/5/2001 and 1/5/2003, considering the relaxation of D.Ed. qualification by government resolutions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are allowed. The petitioners are granted approval from 1/5/2001 and 1/5/2003 respectively. The interim order stands confirmed. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Relaxation of D.Ed. qualification for Hostel Superintendent
  • Government Resolution dated 5/2/2000 and 3/6/2008
  • Eligibility criteria H.S.C. with preference to B.P.Ed.
  • Approval from date of eligibility
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (11) 19

Writ Petition No.7208 of 2004 and Writ Petition No.788 of 2005

2017-11-02

Ravindra V. Ghuge and Sunil K. Kotwal

Shri R.R. Suryawanshi for petitioners, Shri Y.G. Gujarathi, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 4

Balaji Bapurao Chandanwar and Uttam s/o Lalu Waghmare

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking appointment approvals for Hostel Superintendents

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought approval to the post of Hostel Superintendent from 1/5/2001 and 1/5/2003 respectively.

Filing Reason

The State had not granted approval, likely due to qualification issues regarding D.Ed.; petitioners sought court intervention for approval.

Previous Decisions

Similar writ petition No.5713/2003 was allowed on 18/10/2016 by this court, granting approval based on Government Resolution dated 3/6/2008. Interim relief was granted in these petitions on 10/2/2005 and provisional approvals were given on 23/9/2005.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to appointment approvals from the dates claimed considering the relaxation of D.Ed. qualification by Government Resolutions.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that they were eligible for the posts based on H.S.C. qualification and the relaxation of D.Ed. by Government Resolutions dated 5/2/2000 and 3/6/2008, and they had been working for 20 years. The learned A.G.P. did not dispute the qualification requirements.

Ratio Decidendi

Government Resolution dated 5/2/2000 relaxed the D.Ed. qualification for Hostel Superintendents, making H.S.C. the eligibility criteria with preference for B.P.Ed. The State's subsequent GR dated 3/6/2008 confirmed the relaxation. Thus, petitioners who possessed H.S.C. qualification were eligible for appointment from the outset, and approval must be granted from the claimed dates.

Judgment Excerpts

the requisite qualification was H.S.C., and weightage was to be given to a candidate possessing the D.Ed. qualification. the Government has concluded that the additional qualification of D.Ed. shall stand relaxed. H.S.C. Qualification shall be the eligibility criteria, and if a candidate possesses B.P.Ed. degree, he may be granted preference. both these petitions are allowed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions in 2004 and 2005 respectively. Interim relief was granted on 10/2/2005. Provisional approval was granted by respondents 3 and 4 on 23/9/2005 pursuant to interim order. The cases were to be heard along with Writ Petition No.5713/2003, which was decided on 18/10/2016 in favor of similarly placed petitioner. The present petitions were heard together and decided on 2/11/2017.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Hostel Superintendents' Petitions for Appointment Approval — Relaxation of D.Ed. Qualification by Government Resolutions. Court Holds that H.S.C. Qualification Sufficed and Grants Approval from Original App...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Airport Project Despite Procedural Lapses. Court Holds That Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Was Unjustified but Refuses to Quash Notificat...