Search Results for "APMC committee term"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "APMC committee term"

56 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging FKCCI Election Results — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Non-Member. Court holds that only members of the Federation can challenge election irregularities under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Societies Registration Act, 1960.

30 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Sri B.L. Shankarappa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the election of office bearers ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation from Rs.7.82 Lakhs to Rs.34.72 Lakhs. Deceased Self-Employed Driver's Income Assessed at Rs.15,000 per Month with 40% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 18 Applied, Contributory Negligence Rejected.

1 Dec 2021

The appeal arises from a vehicular accident on 11-5-2017 at Gimona Phata, Babhulgaon, on Babhulgaon-Yavatmal Road, where Vaibhav Wagh died after being...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Market Committee Members for Non-Payment of Dues Under Maharashtra APMC Act. Rule 41(1)(i) and (k) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967 applied to disqualify members who failed to pay arrears to the Market Committee.

4 Jan 2020

The petitioners, Shankarrao Gajanan Choudhary and three others, were elected members of the Market Committee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricul...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint Against Senior Manager in APMC Act Case — Petitioner Not a 'Trader' Under Section 2(48) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966. Purchase of Notified Produce for Manufacturing Chicken Feed Held Not to Be 'Business of Purchase and Sale' as Defined Under the Act.

10 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Sri Anjan Goswami, Senior Manager of M/s Khadkeshwar Hatcheries Private Limited, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Violation of Natural Justice. Order of Supersession Under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Show Cause Notice Requirement.

14 Jan 2019

The petitioners, who were members of the Umrane Agricultural Produce Market Committee, challenged the order of supersession of the committee passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal Order of APMC Chairman for Non-Compliance with Section 17 of Maharashtra APMC Act — Resolution Not Passed by Requisite Majority. The court held that the requirement of a resolution by at least 10 members is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with.

20 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Sharad Bapuraoji Deshmukh, was an elected Director and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Wardha. The District Dep...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of APMC Chairman Challenging Removal — Show-Cause Notice Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act Must Specify Charges. Removal Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as Notice Was Vague and No Proper Hearing Was Given.

23 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, was a member and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur. He was served with a show-c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Arbitrator Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. Single Judge Holds Rule 18 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 Not Exhaustive and Maintains Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Modern Anitasha Electronics, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice Against Chairman in APMC Removal Case — Notice Issued by In-charge Officer Without Authority Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act

15 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur, challenged a show-cause notice dated 2.6.201...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)