High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging FKCCI Election Results — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Non-Member. Court holds that only members of the Federation can challenge election irregularities under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Societies Registration Act, 1960.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 52
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri B.L. Shankarappa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the election of office bearers of the Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FKCCI), which is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960 and also a company under Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013. The petitioner alleged irregularities in the election process. However, the court noted that the petitioner was not a member of FKCCI and had not produced any document to show that he was a member or had any legal right in the Federation. The court held that only members of the Federation have the locus standi to challenge the election. Additionally, the court observed that even if the petitioner had a grievance, he ought to have availed the alternative remedy of filing a civil suit or approaching the Registrar of Societies, rather than invoking writ jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed as not maintainable.

Headnote

A) Locus Standi - Election Dispute - Non-Member - Maintainability - Companies Act, 2013; Societies Registration Act, 1960 - The petitioner, who was not a member of FKCCI, challenged the election of office bearers alleging irregularities. The court held that only members of the Federation have the right to challenge elections, as the Federation is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act and also a company under Section 8 of the Companies Act. The petitioner failed to establish any legal right or interest in the affairs of the Federation. (Paras 1-10)

B) Election Dispute - Alternative Remedy - Availability of Civil Suit - The court observed that even if the petitioner had a grievance, he ought to have availed the alternative remedy of filing a civil suit or approaching the Registrar of Societies, rather than invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a non-member of the Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FKCCI) has locus standi to challenge the election of its office bearers.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. The petitioner, being a non-member of FKCCI, has no locus standi to challenge the election of its office bearers. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Locus standi
  • Election dispute
  • Non-member
  • Maintainability
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
  • Societies Registration Act
  • 1960
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (09) 46

Writ Petition No.7123 of 2022 (GM-RES)

2022-09-30

Justice Krishna S. Dixit

Sri. K.N. Phanindra, Senior Counsel a/w Sri. Kiran B S, Advocate

Sri. B. L. Shankarappa

Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FKCCI) and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging election of office bearers of FKCCI

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to challenge the election of office bearers of FKCCI alleging irregularities

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged irregularities in the election process of FKCCI

Issues

Whether the petitioner has locus standi to challenge the election of FKCCI as a non-member? Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of alternative remedy?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there were irregularities in the election of office bearers of FKCCI. Respondents contended that the petitioner is not a member of FKCCI and thus has no locus standi to challenge the election.

Ratio Decidendi

Only members of a society or company have the locus standi to challenge the election of its office bearers. A non-member cannot invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226 for such disputes, especially when alternative remedies like civil suit or approaching the Registrar of Societies are available.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is not a member of the Federation and therefore has no locus standi to challenge the election. Even if the petitioner had a grievance, he ought to have availed the alternative remedy of filing a civil suit or approaching the Registrar of Societies.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the election of office bearers of FKCCI. The court heard the matter and dismissed the petition on the ground of lack of locus standi and availability of alternative remedy.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 8
  • Societies Registration Act, 1960:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging FKCCI Election Results — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Non-Member. Court holds that only members of the Federation can challenge election irregularities under the Companies Act, 2013 and the...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to Sale Certificate and Award in Cooperative Bank Loan Recovery — Upholds Validity of Sale to Third Party Purchaser. The Court held that the sale certificate issued under the Maharashtra Cooperative ...