APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995
16 Dec 2005The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...
Search Results for "tender contract"
1604 result(s) found
Found 1604 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Coal Mining Services Agreement Dispute — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Petitioner and Respondent. Court holds that a consortium agreement does not create privity of contract between the lead member and the employer, and the arbitration clause in the draft CMSA cannot be invoked before execution of the main agreement.
30 Jan 2026The petitioner, Adani Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an ...
- 155
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12% per annum. The court held that an interest rate of 18% pendente lite was excessive and modified it to 12% while maintaining post-award interest at 15% under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
12 Jul 2019The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Container Corporation of India Ltd. (CONCOR) agai...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Award of Container Terminal Contract to PSA International. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any public interest or mala fides in the tender process for the 4th Container Terminal at JNPT.
15 Jul 2014The petitioner, Mandar Narhari Parab, claiming to be a journalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the d...
- 134
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Banning Order Issued by Public Sector Undertaking – Allegations of Blacklisting Without Proper Notice and Violation of Fundamental Rights. Petitioner Contends That Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Intention to Ban for Three Years, Rendering Order Arbitrary.
27 Oct 2016The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a private limited company engaged in corrosion resistant coating applica...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitrability of Disputes Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Measures Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits, Emphasizing That Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Must Be Examined.
8 Feb 2024The appellant, M/s. Ambarwadikar and Company, a registered partnership firm engaged in infrastructure business, filed a commercial appeal against a co...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract by Food Corporation of India Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Non-Submission of Bank Guarantee Within Stipulated Period Held to be Force Majeure, and Debarment Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.
5 Apr 2022The petitioner, M/s. Gupta Freight Carrier, a proprietorship firm, was awarded a contract by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) on 20.03.2020 for tra...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bharti Airtel's Challenge to Tender for Bandwidth Services — Eligibility Condition Requiring Government Experience Upheld. Court Holds That Tender Conditions Are Not Open to Judicial Review Unless Arbitrary or Mala Fide, and the Condition Was Rationally Connected to the Object of the Tender Under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
19 Aug 2019The petitioners, Bharti Airtel Limited and its officer, challenged a tender issued by Maharashtra Information Technology Corporation Limited (MahaIT) ...
- 126
High Court
Madras High Court Decrees Recovery of Port Charges in Favor of Chennai Port Trust Against Vessel Owner for Unpaid Berth Hire and Port Dues Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. The court held that the statutory charge under Section 64 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 attaches to the vessel and the purchaser is liable for pre-existing dues, and waiver granted to previous owner is not binding on the plaintiff.
23 Jan 2026The plaintiff, Board of Trustees of the Port of Chennai, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,08,84,931/- with interest at 15% per annum from the defenda...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.
10 Dec 2013The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...
- 101
