Search Results for "substantive offence"

2143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Whether Conviction Under Sections 376 and 354 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Is Sustainable on Evidence of Attempted Penetration. Court Considers Requirement of Penetration for Rape and Impact of Delayed FIR and Prior Opportunities to Complain.

The present appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Siddharth Dagadu Sonde, by the learned Special Judge, Pune, in Special Child Sessions C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Contractor in Section 482 Cr.P.C. Petition. FIR Under Sections 379, 406, 420 IPC Quashed as Dispute Was Civil in Nature and Complaint Filed as Counterblast for Recovery of Money.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between Modern Asset (petitioner) and KNK Constructions Private Limited (2nd respondent). The 2nd respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 307, 397 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The appellant, Anil Lilachand Sarjare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.132/2007 for offences under Sections 307 read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery with Firearm in Chain Snatching Incident. Appellant's conviction under Sections 307 and 397 IPC sustained based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The appellant, Mohd. Hussain Kayyum Shaikh, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.340 of 2009 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Two Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shrimant @ Wantya s/o Mokinda Pawar and Dashrath s/o Shrimant Pawar, were convicted by the trial court for the murder of one person un...