Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery with Firearm in Chain Snatching Incident. Appellant's conviction under Sections 307 and 397 IPC sustained based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 69
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mohd. Hussain Kayyum Shaikh, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.340 of 2009 for offences under Sections 307 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The prosecution case was that on 4th May 2009, at about 12:00 noon, Draupadabai (PW6) was proceeding to attend a Haldi ceremony when the appellant caught her hand and snatched her golden chain. She raised cries, and her son Jayendra (PW3) and nephew Shivaji (PW1) chased the appellant. Shivaji found the appellant entering a lane at Bhusaval compound and attempted to catch him, but the appellant opened fire with a country-made handgun. Shivaji bent down to avoid the shot, and the appellant fired again but missed. The appellant then entered a mosque. The trial court convicted the appellant under Sections 307 and 397 IPC, sentencing him to 10 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000 for each offence, with sentences to run concurrently. The appellant was acquitted of charges under the Arms Act and Bombay Police Act. The High Court, in appeal, upheld the conviction, finding the evidence of eyewitnesses credible and corroborated by medical evidence. The court dismissed the appeal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 IPC - Conviction - Eyewitness testimony of victim and independent witnesses corroborated by medical evidence - Held that the prosecution proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 1-3).

B) Criminal Law - Robbery with Firearm - Section 397 IPC - Use of deadly weapon - Appellant fired a country-made handgun at the victim during chase - Held that the offence under Section 397 IPC is made out (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 307 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Sections 307 and 397 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Section 307 IPC
  • Section 397 IPC
  • conviction based on eyewitness testimony
  • medical evidence corroborating injury
  • concurrent running of sentences
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (09) 70

Criminal Appeal No.399 of 2013

2015-09-03

Abhay M. Thipsay

Mr. Salimuddin A. Shaikh for the Appellant, Mr. D.P. Adsule for the Respondent State

Mohd. Hussain Kayyum Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for attempt to murder and robbery with firearm.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the High Court.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court under Sections 307 and 397 IPC.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 11th February 2013 in Sessions Case No.340 of 2009.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 307 IPC is sustainable. Whether the conviction under Section 397 IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient. State argued that the evidence of eyewitnesses and medical evidence supported the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction under Sections 307 and 397 IPC is sustainable based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, and the appellant's use of a firearm during the robbery constitutes an offence under Section 397 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 11th February 2013... convicting the appellant... of offences punishable under Sections 307 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, on 11th February 2013 in Sessions Case No.340 of 2009. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, which dismissed the appeal on 3rd September 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 307, 397
  • Arms Act, 1959: 25
  • Bombay Police Act, 1951: 135
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement with Backwages for Temporary Teacher Terminated Without Following Procedure. Termination of a teacher appointed on temporary basis for three consecutive academic years held illegal as...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery with Firearm in Chain Snatching Incident. Appellant's conviction under Sections 307 and 397 IPC sustained based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.