Search Results for "statutory purchase"

2850 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2850 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Application — Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares Held as Debt, Not Investment. The Court held that CRPS constitute a debt under Section 3(11) of IBC, 2016, and the appellant is a financial creditor entitled to file an application under Section 7.

The appeal arises from the dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the NCLT and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act in Stockist Agreement Dispute. Respondent Raises Preliminary Objections Based on MSMED Act and Alleged Forgery of Arbitration Agreement.

The arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by the petitioner, a proprietary concern acting a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Under Sections 46 and 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arises from International Sale of Steel Coils Where Italian Company Sought to Enforce Award Against Indian Steel Manufacturer.

The case concerns a petition filed under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking enforcement of a foreign arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Revision Order in FCCB Capital Gains Case; Cost of Acquisition Dispute Between FCCB Scheme and Section 49(2A) of Income-tax Act Examined. Revenue Relied on Section 49(2A) While Petitioner Invoked Clause 7(4) of the 1993 Scheme.

The writ petition under Article 226 was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Denying Interim Protection Despite Registered Device Mark and Alleged Joint Use of the 'Kshetrapal' Mark.

The dispute centered on the use of the trademark 'Shree Kshetrapal' / 'Kshetrapal Construction' by two individuals in the construction business in Guj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Rules on Motor Vehicle Alteration Over Central Prototype Norms. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules permit structural alterations with registering authority's approval, overriding Central Motor Vehicle Rules' restriction on deviation from prototype test.

The case involved a conflict of judicial opinion in the Kerala High Court regarding the permissibility of structural alterations to motor vehicles tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal in Money Suit. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application for Rejection of Plaint Dismissed as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.

The case involves three civil revision applications filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging a common order date...