Search Results for "section 24(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 24(2)"

512 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge Order for Restoration of Possession or Compensation. Land Acquisition Lapses Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years of Award.

7 Jul 2023

The State of Karnataka filed an intra-court appeal challenging the order dated 13.01.2021 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.61563/2011 (LA-RE...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Land Acquisition Collector in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Overruled Precedent Leads to Reversal. Possession Taken in 2004 Precludes Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves an appeal by the Land Acquisition Collector (South East), Delhi Government, against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 25.04...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal Against Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. Possession Taken and Compensation Deposited Preclude Deemed Lapse.

2 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and another against the judgment of the Delhi High Court. The High Court ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government of NCT of Delhi's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Set Aside Due to Pendency of Proceedings Initiated by Landowners. The Court held that when possession could not be taken due to court orders obtained by landowners, the period of interim orders is excluded in computing five years for lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

2 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the High Court of Delhi's judgment in Writ Petition (C) No. 2709 of 2015, which declared that land acq...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Land Acquisition by BDA Due to Lapse of Proceedings — Acquisition Initiated in 1993 Deemed Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

29 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Sri B S Sudhakar Shetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Compensation Deposited in Court Constitutes Valid Payment. Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Lapse After Compensation Deposited in Court on Award Date.

20 Dec 2016

The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of late Narayan Aditwar Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Awards Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Deposit of Compensation in Government Account Not Equivalent to Payment or Deposit in Court.

16 Feb 2016

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging land acquisition awards under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners sought a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act — Petitioners Guilty of Suppression of Facts. Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Rejected as Petitioners Had Received Compensation and Suppressed Earlier Proceedings.

24 Nov 2015

The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the acquisition of their lands b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Non-Payment of Compensation. Land Acquisition Lapses Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Compensation Not Paid and Possession Not Taken.

23 Apr 2014

The petitioners, owners of land in survey nos. 154/1, 154/2, 156/1, challenged the acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents under the Land...

47 48 49 50 51

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)