Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

1313 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1313 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Tenant Ordered to Vacate Property Due to Rent Arrears and Bonafide Requirement. Court Upholds Landlord's Claim of Bonafide Need and Rent Default, Orders Eviction.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay upheld the decisions of the Small Causes Court and the District Court, Pune, directing the defendant (tenant) t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Vesting of Private Forest Land Under Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The court affirmed the tribunal's rejection of the claimant's exemption plea due to insufficient evidence of principal cultivation as plantation under Section 2(f) of the Act.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the vesting of land under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The respondent, Popular ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Suit for Specific Performance Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Refusal to Execute Sale Deed in 2018.

The appellants, Sri K.T. Govinde Gowda and Smt. G. Anuradha, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Possession. Counterclaim for Ownership Based on Adverse Possession Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owners.

The case involves a property dispute between two sets of parties over a house and land in Bicholim, Goa. The respondents/plaintiffs (Shaikh Mohammad A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Appellate Court's Finding of Adverse Possession. The court held that the appellants failed to prove title and that the respondents had perfected title by adverse possession over the suit property.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) against the judgment and decree of the Senior Civil Judge and ...