Search Results for "pancha witness"

599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 5, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Satara on 17/5/2010 in Sessions Case No. 38 of 2009 under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Contradicted Each Other and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Dilip Sukhdeo Gaikwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for the murder of his wife Tulsabai under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4, 6, 8, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Mahadeo @ Nana Gundiba Khandale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati in Special (POCSO) Case No.8/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Indonesian National in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Search Procedures. Conviction for possession of 3.930 kg Methamphetamine set aside as prosecution failed to follow Section 52-A NDPS Act sampling requirements and Section 50 search safeguards.

The appellant, an Indonesian national, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for possession of 3.930 kg of Methamphetamine and sentenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Rash Driving Case — Death Caused by Negligent Driving of Mini Truck. Concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence cannot be interfered with in revision.

The applicant, Pradeep N. Shetgaonkar, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) on 01/10/2012 for offences under Sections 279, 338,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Deceased Identified Through Tattoo Marks; Last Seen Theory and Motive Established.

The appellant, Uddhav @ Madhukar Ramchandra Jadhav, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for the murder of Gaman Dashrath Paw...