Search Results for "interlocutory order challenge"

1158 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1158 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Challenge to Family Court Order for Decree on Admission in Divorce Case — Order XII Rule 6 CPC Not Applicable Where Parties Allege Cruelty on Different Facts. Family Court Cannot Suo Motu Pass Decree on Admission Without Clear Admission of Same Cause of Action.

The petitioner wife filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground of cruelty. The respondent husb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in VAT Assessment Case — Interim Relief Restored Pending Disposal of Writ Petition. Appellant's challenge to assessment order under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 upheld on ground of violation of principles of natural justice.

The appellant, M/s. Ghodawat Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the learned Single Judge challenging an assessment order under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Notice of Motion in Suit Challenging Suspension of Jockey by Turf Club; Challenge Based on Unreasoned Order. Domestic Tribunal Must Give Reasons for Its Decisions, Especially When Affecting Livelihood, Argues Plaintiff.

The plaintiff, a jockey with over 20 years of experience, filed a suit and notice of motion challenging the order of the Board of Appeal of the Royal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Magistrate to Implement SARFAESI Order for Bank Possession. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Bound to Execute Section 14 Order for Taking Physical Possession of Secured Assets with Police Assistance.

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company as defined in Clause 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, filed a criminal writ petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Directing Court Fee on Market Value in Partition Suit. Valuation Must Be Decided on Plaint Allegations, Not Cross-Examination Admissions, Under Sections 35(1) and 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

The writ petition arose from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the plaintiff (petitioner) against his brother and the legal heirs ...