Search Results for "expert witness"

1406 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1406 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit Challenging Will on Grounds of Suspicious Circumstances and Lack of Testamentary Capacity. Will dated 9th March 1981 held not duly executed and attested as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case concerns a testamentary suit filed by Sulochana Dinanath Tarkar (since deceased, represented by her sons Sunil and Harish) seeking Letters of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape and Abortion Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Allegations of Rape and Forced Abortion Fail as Prosecution Witnesses Turn Hostile and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Prosecution Case Under Sections 376, 314 r/w 34 IPC and SC/ST Act.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Shivaji Ghodekar and Dr. Shubhangi Chinnawar in Sessions Case No. 123/2001. The case arose ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Accused in NIA Case Under UAPA for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in Trial. Appellant Granted Bail as Prosecution Failed to Establish Direct Link to Conspiracy in Antilia Bomb Scare Case.

The appellant, Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma, was accused No. 10 in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) under various sections of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder in Unlawful Assembly Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained Under Section 302 read with 149 IPC. Common Object of Assault Proved Despite Acquittal for Robbery Under Section 396 IPC.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Dhondiram Balu Dhotre, Satish Vithal Dhotre, Ashok Balu Dhotre, and Vitthal Balu Dhotre (original accu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence of Accused in Rape of Minor Case from 10 Years to 7 Years. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Upheld Based on Credible Testimony of 9-Year-Old Victim and Medical Evidence.

The judgment arises from two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.1172 of 2007 filed by the accused Pandurang Lalasaheb Yadav challenging his conviction and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(ii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pradeep H. Harwalkar, a Junior Passenger Assistant with Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., was convicted by the Special Court for CBI in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC in Circumstantial Evidence Case. Appellant Questioned Reliability of Evidence, Plea of Alibi, and Absence of Motive; Final Judgment Not Provided in Available Text.

The appeal arose from a conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Sessions Case No. 1...