Search Results for "equitable considerations"

604 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, Limitation Barred Suit. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and payment of earnest money; suit filed beyond three years from date of refusal.

The present Regular First Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 03.08.2022 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad, in O....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Domestic Violence Case — Sets Aside Appellate Order for Non-Compliance with Section 29 of D.V. Act. Appellate Court Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing to Complainant Before Setting Aside Conviction Order.

The petitioner, Smt. Roopa B.C., filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (D.V. Act) against her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Condition of Security for Vacating Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit - Cargo Owner Not Liable for Demurrage and Port Charges as They Are Not Party to Contract of Carriage

The appellant, Best Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against an order dated 4th February 2010 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Minority Scholarship Schemes as Constitutional — Schemes for Minority Communities Do Not Violate Article 14 or 15(1) as They Are Based on Backwardness and Not Religion Alone.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two public interest litigations challenging the constitutional validity of two scholarship schemes for minority comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Grant Lease in Favour of Air India Employees' Cooperative Housing Society. Transfer of Land Allotted to Air India for Staff Quarters Requires Prior Permission of CIDCO Under New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations 1975.

The petitioners, a cooperative housing society formed by employees of Air India, sought a writ of mandamus directing CIDCO to grant a lease in their f...