Search Results for "contractual insurance"

602 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 602 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Railway Bio-Diesel Supply Dispute — Fall Clause Interpretation Upheld. Court finds that comparing prices for different delivery distances without adjusting for freight is impermissible, and the arbitral tribunal's view is plausible.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Central Railway) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbit...