Search Results for "benefit under Section 14(2)"

1046 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1046 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Death Sentence Reference in Gang Rape and Murder Case. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence of Last Seen Together and Forcible Abduction from House of Victim's Uncle.

The matter arises from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Protection in Service for Employee with Invalid Caste Certificate. Employee who gave up challenge to caste invalidation order granted reinstatement without back wages or reservation benefits.

The petitioner, Rajendra s/o Ramaji Mahisbadwe, was employed with National Aviation Company of India Limited (NACIL) based on a caste certificate clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...