Search Results for "Safeguard Duty"

1191 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1191 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Entry of Petitioner as Suspect in Charge-Sheet Holding Naming Suspect Without Evidence Illegal. Describing Person as Suspect in Police Report Under Section 173 CrPC Violates Procedure Established by Law and Right to Reputation Under Article 21.

The dispute arose from the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) paper scam case. The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) registered an FIR on 20 June...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Stamp Duty Dispute — Agreement for Sale Without Possession Delivery Not a Conveyance Under Article 25 Schedule I of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Document Dated 03/3/2000 Held to Be Mere Agreement for Sale, Not Requiring Stamp Duty as Conveyance.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellants (legal representatives of the original defendant) against a judgment of a learned Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Non-Speaking Order Under Section 17(5) of Customs Act — Directs Speaking Order Within Two Weeks. Failure to Pass Speaking Order After Payment Under Protest Violates Statutory Mandate.

The petitioner, JKC General Trading Company, a partnership firm, imported goods and was assessed customs duty by the respondents. The petitioner paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in ESI Coverage Dispute - Section 2A and Regulation 10B Held Mandatory. Employer's Failure to Obtain Code Number Does Not Excuse Contribution Liability Under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...