Search Results for "Project Affected Person"

996 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 996 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Landowner's Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Delay in Final Notification Under Section 11(7) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Preliminary Notification Deemed Rescinded as Final Notification Not Issued Within Statutory Period.

The petitioner, Sri K. Ganganna, owned lands that were acquired by the respondents for the Indian Railways. A preliminary notification under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing and Bail Applications in PMLA Case. Court upholds Special Court's orders extending judicial custody and rejecting bail, applying twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA.

The case arises from an FIR (Crime No.109 of 2020) lodged by Mahendra S. Surana, a Director of M/s. Aurangabad Gymkhana Club Private Limited, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Award Due to Arbitrariness in Technical Evaluation. Petitioner's Bid Rejected Without Proper Consideration of Clarifications, Court Directs Reconsideration.

The petitioner, Kartikay Exploration and Mining Services Pvt. Ltd., challenged the award of a tender by the National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxation of Alleged Shortfall in Share Premium Under Transfer Pricing Provisions. The Dispute Centers on Whether Chapter X of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Can Apply When No Actual Income Arises from the International Transaction.

The petitioner, Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident holding company, issued 2,89,224 equity shares at a pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC Plot Allotments — No Arbitrariness Found in Allotment Process. Petitioner's claim for allotment based on alleged earmarking fails as no legal right established.

The petitioner, Vikrant Industries, a sole proprietorship, filed a writ petition under Articles 226, 14, and 19 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises from Correction of Clerical Error in 7/12 Extract.

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, which confirmed a mutati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Suo Motu Directions to State to Ensure Proper Care for Mentally Deficient Children in Homes. State’s Failure to Implement Juvenile Justice Act Provisions Prompted Mandatory Directions for Streamlined Recognition, Management Committees, and Mental Health Care.

This suo motu Public Interest Litigation was initiated by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on the basis of a newspaper report dated 24 August 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC Cuts Imposed on Film on Drug Addiction; Holds Pre-Censorship Must Conform to Article 19(2) Reasonable Restrictions. State's Decision to Delete References to Punjab and Mutilate Content Violates Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The first petitioner, a film production company, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the decision of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) w...