Search Results for "Andhra Pradesh Act 1986"

549 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 549 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Property Encroachment Case — Defendant Acquitted of Adverse Possession Claim. Suit for Possession by Trust Held Not Barred by Limitation as Encroachment is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Namdeo Khedkar (appellant/defendant) against the judgment of the Joint District Judge, Chandrapur, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in CPC Application Rejection Case - Application under Order VII Rule XI of CPC for rejection of plaint was rightly dismissed as the appellants failed to establish grounds for rejection.

The dispute arose from a property partition involving land in Survey Nos. 700/A7B and 706/A9 of Nandyal Town, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Human Trafficking Case Under Section 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. Minor Girls Rescued from Brothel, Evidence of Detention and Cruelty Established.

The case involves the conviction of Smt. Rita Dilip Ghosh (the applicant) under Section 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (PITA) for det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Conditions for Land Conversion — Land Granted on New and Impartible Tenure Remains Occupancy Class II and Subject to Unearned Income Payment Under Section 29 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioner, M/s. Niketan Land and Estate Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/02/2010 passed by the Collector, Nashik, which allowed the conver...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions for Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Statutory notice requirement under Section 434(1)(a) held mandatory and cannot be waived by agreement between parties.

The petitioner, Dolphin Investment Pvt. Ltd., filed two company petitions under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruit District Judge's Claim for Seniority Over Promotees in Kerala Higher Judicial Service. Notional Seniority Granted from Date of Initial Appointment of Other Direct Recruits in Same Selection.

The case involves a dispute over seniority between direct recruit District Judges and promotees appointed by transfer in the Kerala Higher Judicial Se...