Search Results for "section 34"

604 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Deed of Reconstituted Partnership Held Genuine. Court finds no perversity in arbitrator's finding that the 26 May 2006 partnership deed was duly proved by claimant's testimony identifying signatories.

The case involves an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award passed by a so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Challenge to NSE Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Squaring Off of Client's Position Due to Margin Shortfall. Regulation 3.10 of NSE F&O Regulations Does Not Mandate Prior Written Notice Before Squaring Off; Award Based on Evidence.

The Petitioner, M/s Shaunik Infotech Pvt Ltd, was a registered client of the Respondent, India Infoline Ltd, a trading member of the National Stock Ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Excise Duty Reimbursement Dispute. Contractual interpretation of purchase order clause for reimbursement of excise duty paid by contractor to Railways.

The Petitioner, M/s Creative Engineers, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Land Procurement Dispute — Refund of Rs.91 Lakhs Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Land Procurement Under MOU.

The petitioner, Manvel Tuscano, sole proprietor of M/s. Manvel Land Empire, and the respondent, DLF Limited, a real estate developer, entered into a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds That the Arbitrator's Finding on Limitation Was Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...