Search Results for "section 24(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 24(2)"

512 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Government of NCT of Delhi in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Overturns High Court's Declaration of Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 1986 and Compensation Not Paid Does Not Result in Lapse as per Indore Development Authority Constitution Bench Decision.

15 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA and Govt. of NCT of Delhi Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Not Deemed Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Act, 2013 When Possession Taken but Compensation Not Paid. Possession Taken on 26.05.1998 Vests Land in State; No Divesting Under Section 24(2) as per Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal.

15 Dec 2022

The case involves appeals by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Government of NCT of Delhi against a judgment of the Delhi High Court. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Lucknow Development Authority's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Possession Taken Prior to 2013 Act Precludes Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2). Twin Conditions of Non-Possession and Non-Payment Must Be Satisfied for Lapse; Possession Taken in 2003 Vests Land in State.

12 Dec 2022

The case involves an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 03.07.2017, wh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. Possession Taken, Compensation Not Paid Does Not Result in Lapse as Twin Conditions Must Be Satisfied.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had declared t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court Order Set Aside. Compensation Non-Payment Does Not Automatically Trigger Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 When Possession Has Been Taken.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had declared t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court's Declaration of Deemed Lapse Set Aside Due to Pendency of Proceedings Preventing Possession. The Court held that where possession could not be taken due to pending litigation initiated by landowners, the acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

2 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. High Court's reliance on overruled Pune Municipal Corporation decision renders declaration of lapse unsustainable.

2 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi and another appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which declared that the acquisition proceedings conce...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Declaration of Lapsed Acquisition — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Challenge Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 2007 Precludes Deemed Lapse as Both Possession and Compensation Must Be Unpaid for Five Years.

2 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and another against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court Order Set Aside Due to Overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation. Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 When Possession Has Been Taken.

2 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which declared that the acquisition proceedings under the Land Ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Land Acquisition Collector in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Compensation Deposited in Court Sufficient Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. High Court's declaration of lapse set aside as per Constitution Bench decision in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal.

2 Dec 2022

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for land in village Chattarpur, New Delhi. A notifica...

46 47 48 49 50

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)