Search Results for "sale sanction"

1499 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1499 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Purchaser's Challenge to SARFAESI Action; Sale During Injunction Void. Sale of Mortgaged Property During Pendency of Injunction Order Held Void; Purchaser Has No Right to Question Prior Equitable Mortgage Under Section 58(f) of Transfer of Property Act.

The writ petition challenged the orders of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) and the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dismissing the petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that mandatory sanction for prosecution of public servants was not obtained, rendering the entire proceedings unsustainable.

The applicants, Ravindra Babulal Jain and Ashish Tejmal Mugdiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Revocation of Slaughter Licenses by Municipal Corporation; Questions of Arbitrariness and Natural Justice Violation Examined Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The Bombay Suburban Khatik Association, an association of butchers and mutton vendors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Manufacturer in Food Adulteration Case Due to Belated Filing After Expiry of Best Before Date. Right Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Frustrated as Complaint Filed 16 Months After Best Before Date.

The applicant, M/s Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturing company, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Food Adulteration Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 — Groundnut Oil Sample Found Adulterated. Accused's Conviction for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil and Carrying on Business Without License Confirmed by Appellate and Revisional Courts.

The case involves two criminal revision applications filed by Jairam Shadija, the accused, challenging the order dated 28.08.2015 passed by the learne...