Search Results for "re-settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Examines Challenge to Regularisation Certificate Issued Under Mixe...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Challenging High Court’s Order Dismissing Absorpti...

Search Results for "re-settlement"

496 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 496 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. The court held that the appellants failed to prove adverse possession and the suit for partition was within limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

16 Jun 2026

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by the defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and the first appellate court in a suit...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal by Chennai Metro Rail Ltd. in Land Acquisition Dispute — Government Land Transfer Upheld Over Private Ownership Claims. Grama Natham Land Classified as Government Property Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, Not Subject to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jun 2026

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) and its officers against an order of a single judge dated 02.04...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Eviction of Encroachers from Water Body Due to Lack of Evidence. Petitioner Failed to Produce Revenue Records or Survey Report, Court Held That Disputed Questions of Fact Cannot Be Adjudicated Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

16 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Lion.G.Devarajan, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the government respondents to consider his...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs NHAI to Consider Petitioner's Representation for Enhanced Compensation Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Court Orders Respondents to Pass Orders on Representation Within Eight Weeks Without Expressing Opinion on Merits.

27 Jan 2025

The petitioner, P. Felcy Helen Mary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition Notices for Structure Affected by Road Over Bridge Alignment. Court Directs Municipal Corporation to First Decide Land Ownership and Compensation Issues Before Demolition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

18 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Jasuben Raghavji Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Structures in Mohili Village. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to occupy public land and structures were found to be illegal encroachments under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

1 Mar 2018

The petitioners, 14 individuals occupying shops and structures in Mohili Village, Sakinaka, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the proposed dem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Compensation Claim by Co-owner Under National Highways Act, 1956 — Interpretation of Section 3-H(3) and (4) Clarified. The court held that when a dispute arises regarding apportionment of compensation among co-owners, the Land Acquisition Officer must refer the matter to arbitration under Section 3-H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956, and cannot reject the claim on the ground of disputed title.

29 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Arun Trimbakrao Lokare, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 05.01.2017 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Make Award Within Two Years from Declaration Under Section 6 Renders Proceedings Lapsed.

6 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Smt. Nilima Mahesh Bhole, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashment of land acquisition ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 — Land Acquisition Lapses Due to Non-Compliance with Section 11(2) and Failure to Pay Compensation Within Five Years. The court held that non-payment of compensation within five years from the date of award under Section 11(2) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 results in lapse of acquisition, and directed return of possession.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, ten retired individuals, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their lands by the Maharashtra Industrial Development C...

46 47 48 49 50

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)