Search Results for "private party"

6791 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6791 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2015

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a direction in an order dated 21.10.2013, passed in Company Application (L) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana. Rule 24(i-eeee) of Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914 as State Government Cannot Delegate Power to Determine Number of Licenses for Entire State.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 (as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana — Rule 24(i-eeee) Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914. State Government's Exclusive Power Under Section 58(2)(e) to Regulate Licenses in Local Areas Cannot Be Delegated to Financial Commissioner.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...